NOATIKL VS RAPIDCOMPOSER FULL
Is it because he's using the same sounds? Or is it because the plugin simply has a limited range in what it can do?Īctually when I loaded up the full program (after purchase) I used a synth bass and pad, but threw in classical guitar for chords, sample based orchestral strings for additional pad, and cello piz for one of the "arp like" selections. And you haven't started with the fourth part yet. So you noodle again and you get the first and second part sounding good but the third part now needs noodling. Yes.you noodle and noodle with the part and at last you get something that sounds good.īut it doesn't fit with the first part. They are for ideas to spur you on and at minimum help you to find nice chord sequences that sound well together Surely with Insta Composer ( from my viewing of the run through vid above ) you can start with your 10 bars, save that "pattern" then noodle around with the features to make a different part based on the initial 10 bars and so on.Īny of these programs are not meant to build a song / hit for you from start to finish. Then you need a Chorus ( repeated ) and a Bridge, maybe an intro So the 10 bars you talk of would be enough for a VERSE which, as a part, will be repeated 2 or 3 times. I believe that part of the creative process in using these plugins is being able to see the possibilities presented and then expand on them, kind of like taking a piece of diftwood and carving it into a image based on the hints of an image contained in the driftwood.Ī song is usually made up of repeated parts ( EG Intro, Verse1, Chorus, Verse2, chorus, Bridge, chorus Chorus ). I do not look at these plugins with the idea that they will produce songs for me. I actually found the InstaComposer videos interesting and could see how it might spark ideas. If you feel that only humans can produce listenable music and you want your plugins to produce music that sounds like it was produced by humans, then these plugins will be a disappointment. I guess how you respond to a plugin like InstaComposer depends on your tastes, goals and expectations. This is certainly more helpful than "sounds pretty lame to me". The best things I have found are plugins like EZbass where you're providing the harmonic structure to the plugin and then it's using real performance data from an actual musician to generate the part.
I'm sure there's one or two more I've come across in a simiar vein.
NOATIKL VS RAPIDCOMPOSER LICENSE
I've tried things like Cthulu by Xfer, I have a license for the Captain Plugins which seemed like a good idea at the time but after intial experiments found it wasn't that much use to me, but they have a drum - bass and melody plugin as well.Įvery time there is a an update to AIVA I give it a try to see where it's at but it's not there yet although it's certainly better at creating something semi-listenable than instacomposer.
I've not heard anything that generates "AI" music.i.e chords, melodies etc that I've felt compelled to use. Are there any generative midi tools that you find useful or are you of the school that all generative midi tools are garbage?
0 kommentar(er)
